Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

156 S.W.3d 524

Rockett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-03-01

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2013

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-03-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Deadrick Rockett appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rockett’s motion was denied after evidentiary hearing.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

/156/sw3d/524 · .json · Public domain