Bobby Doyle Getts v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 173rd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Gainous v. State · DuBose v. State · State v. Hernandez · Weaver v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant’s 1984 conviction for DWI meets each of the requirements for remoteness because 1) the conviction was a final conviction, 2) the 2002 DWI offense was committed more than ten years after the 1984 date of conviction for DWI, and 3) the 1997 DWI conviction did not occur within ten year’s of the 1984 conviction. 23”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Getts v. State“Did the Court of Appeals correctly interpret the 2001 amendment to Penal Code § 49.09(e) such that the relevant ten-year period for an intervening conviction is now the period between the two prior DWI’s rather than the ten-year period before the date of the primary offense?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Getts v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.