Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 U.S. 537 - Ard v. Brandon

Ard v. Brandon’s Empirical Analysis

156 U.S. 537 · 1895

Citation profile

117
cited by 117 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
January 1976
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 16 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 117 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1976 · most notably American Steel Wire Company v. R a Speed (1904), Joseph Parker Camp v. Kate Willard Boyd (1913)

31 federal appellate · 16 district · 27 state decisions — followed in 11 states

380189519001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shepley v. Cowan · Frisbie v. Whitney · Hutchings v. Low · United States v. Missouri K T Ry Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If he [the homestead settler] does all that the statute prescribes as the condition of acquiring rights, the law protects him in those rights, and does not make their continued existence depend alone upon the question whether or no he takes an appeal from an adverse decision of the officers charged with the duty of acting upon his application.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Doubtless the error could have been corrected by an appeal, and perhaps that would have been the better way; but when, instead of pursuing that remedy, lie is persuaded by the local land officer that he can accomplish that which he desires in another way—a way that to him seems simpler and easier —it would l)e putting too much of i'igor and technicality into a remedial and beneficial statute like the homestead law to hold that the equitable rights which he had acquired by his application were absolutely lost.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"Hut we are of tlie opinion that the testimony shows a right anterior to his. pre-emption entry—a right, of which he was deprived by the wrongful acts of the local land officer, and which he did not forfeit or lose by virtue of his subsequent efforts to pre-empt the land.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.