Bustos v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1181 (§ 211 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Douglas v. Alabama · Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. Mezei · Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. United States · Bonetti v. Rogers · Texas State AFL-CIO v. Kennedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“who must first be admitted for permanent residence. 18 Those who achieved such admission within a grace period were permitted to enjoy the border crossing privilege. Paragraph Five of the General Order provided that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bustos v. Mitchell“safeguards to protect the American economy from job competition and from adverse working standards as a consequence of immigrant workers entering the labor market.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bustos v. Mitchell“8 C.F.R. 211.1(b)(1) (1972). As Judge Wright so persuasively pointed out in his dissenting opinion in the Gooch case, 10 the construction of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bustos v. Mitchell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.