State v. Holcomb’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2020
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Roy · State v. Bailey · State v. Recor · Burlison v. State · State v. Barr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There was no reason for jurors to distinguish between the two alleged acts. Defendant’s defense did not distinguish between the two acts, and he was not hampered in preparing a defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Carter“failure to give a limiting instruction. . . , in the absence of a request or objection, will be grounds for reversal only on a finding of plain error”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hendricks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.