State v. Akers’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1986
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Tingstad v. Starwich · State ex rel. Lundin v. Superior Court · State Ex Rel. Zbinden v. Superior Court · State v. Caruso
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendant O. O. Akers is hereby remanded to the custody of the sheriff of said county to be by him detained in the county jail of Yakima County . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“did not take actual custody of him in the sense of actually restraining him of his liberty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“rendered himself in execution of the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.