¶1 (dissenting)- — -This decision makes the affidavits of two most vitally interested litigants outweigh the certified records of a justice of the peace who was wholly disinterested. That is a rather startling innovation in the law. The decision also invades the discretionary province of the superior court, which we have never done before in such cases, except for “manifest abuse of discretion,” which is not shown here.
¶2 (dissenting) — I dissent for the reasons stated by Judge Holcomb, and for the further reason that a justice’s record cannot be attacked in the manner here attempted.