Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 WASH2D 580 - State v. Cross

State v. Cross’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Faretta v. California · North Carolina v. Alford · Gregg v. Georgia · Witherspoon v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he goal is to ensure that the sentence, in a particular case, is proportional to sentences given in similar cases; is not freakish, wanton, or random; and is not based on race or other suspect classifications.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[w]hether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Ridgway's abhorrent killings, standing alone, do not render the death penalty unconstitutional or disproportionate. Our law is not so fragile.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.