156 Wis. 2d 761 - State v. Kraemer’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 76 Wis. 2d 286 - In INTEREST OF DH v. State · Bradley v. State · 122 Wis. 2d 431 - County of Racine v. Smith · 45 Wis. 2d 593 - Cross v. State · 122 Wis. 2d 759 - State v. Lewandowski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even if the juvenile court had failed to consider all the statutory waiver criteria ... it is an abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A defendant cannot follow one course of strategy at trial and then, if dissatisfied with the result, complain that he or she should be discharged or retried.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the error claimed by Kraemer, if indeed it was error, is judicial, not jurisdictional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.