¶1Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the evidence presented on the question of fact as to the agency of Fred S. Matthewson for his wife, Anna E. Matthewson, in a contract for the sale of the property in question, should have been submitted to the jury. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented.
157 A.D. 901
Choate v. Matthewson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1913-05-15
Decided 1913-05-15