Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 Ariz. 11 - State v. Fleischman

State v. Fleischman’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
6
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2020

18 state decisions

6019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mincey v. Arizona · 402 So. 2d 365 - Zeigler v. State · State v. Million · State Department of Highways v. Biella · Ortega v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will now adopt the reasoning employed by our sister States. We therefore hold that when a crime is reported to the police by an individual who owns or controls the premises to which the police are summoned, and that individual either states or suggests that it was committed by a third person, he or she implicitly consents to a search of the premises reasonably related to the routine investigation of the offense and the identification of the perpetrator. As long as the individual is not a suspect in the case or does nothing to revoke his consent, the police may search the premises for these purposes, and evidence obtained thereby is admissible. This implied consent is valid only for the initial investigation conducted at the scene and does not cany over to future visits to the scene.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “My wife was killed, they killed my wife.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.