State v. Ball’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2018
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n · State v. Pakula · Lemons v. Superior Court of Gila County · State v. Jones · State v. James
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cannot be literally read to mean that all probations which are imposed must begin immediately”). 4 . Harmonizing the two statutes, we conclude that the authority granted in § 13-903 (A) to impose consecutive terms of probation is limited by the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bowsher“If probation is imposed on one who at the time is serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed on a different conviction, service of the sentence of imprisonment shall not satisfy the probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Redzinak
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.