Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 CALAPP2D 345 - Lang v. Badger

Lang v. Badger’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 1970
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 1970

10 state decisions

60195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 45 Cal. 2d 501 - Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for Women · 34 Cal. 2d 515 - Sapp v. Barenfeld · Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp. · 77 Cal. App. 268 - Dugan v. Phillips · 134 Cal. App. 534 - Stockwell v. Equitable Fire & Marine Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “”... where it appears that parties have appeared and participated fully in the proceedings without objection, they cannot afterward attack the award on the ground that no formal notice of the hearings was given. (Sapp v. Barenfeld, 34 Cal.2d 515, 520 [ 212 P.2d 233 ].)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.