Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 CALAPP3D 554 - In Re King

In Re King’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2006

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

80198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 8 Cal. 3d 410 - In Re Lynch · 33 Cal. 3d 914 - In Re Reed · 66 Cal. App. 3d 453 - In Re Dellasala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The parties agree King drove into the parking lot of a Pup N' Taco restaurant, got out of his car, exposed his penis to two teenage girls, then returned to his car and drove away. King was wearing shorts at the time and his penis was not erect. He did not touch or speak to either of the two girls.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he continuing penalty of sex offender registration is out of all proportion to the crime of misdemeanor indecent exposure. Registration pursuant to section 290 cannot constitutionally be imposed as punishment for persons convicted of misdemeanors under section 314.1.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “insofar as section 290 requires . . . registration of persons convicted under section 647(a), it is void under article I, section 17, of the California Constitution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.