Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

157 Conn. 625

State v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 5, 1969

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1969-02-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1975

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-02-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1It appearing that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit finding the defendant guilty as charged, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the judgments of the trial court and the *626Appellate Division are set aside and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit with direction to render judgment that the defendant is not guilty and ordering that she be discharged.

Michael A. RaJcosky, assistant prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state).Joseph D. Harbaugh, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).Argued February 4decided February 5, 1969
/157/conn/625 · .json · Public domain