¶1It appearing that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit finding the defendant guilty as charged, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the judgments of the trial court and the *626Appellate Division are set aside and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit with direction to render judgment that the defendant is not guilty and ordering that she be discharged.
157 Conn. 625
State v. Stanley
Decided February 5, 1969
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1969-02-05
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1975
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1969-02-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →