Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

157 F. 676

Docket No. 641.

Blankenship v. King

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1906.)

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1906-05-01

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1943

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1906-05-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.

¶2E. M. Fulton and R. R. Henry (Ayers & Fulton, on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.

¶3Maynard F. Stiles-, -for defendant in error. ■ •

¶4Before GOFF and PRITCHARD, Circuit Judges, and DAYTON, District Judge.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6The court below, in passing upon the questions involved in this writ of error, filed two opinions — the first on December 21, 1903, the. second on January 25, 1905 — which are reported in 137 Fed., at pages 198 and 222, respectively. All of the questions raised by the assignments of error were fully, considered in said opinions, and numerous pertinent authorities were cited therein. After a thorough examination of the record, and due consideration of the arguments of counsel, we find that the conclusions reached by the court below are sound. Concurring in said opinions, we find it unnecessary to' file another.

¶7There being.no error in the judgment of the court below, the same is affirmed.

/157/f1d/676 · .json · Public domain