Teichmann v. Parrish

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 30, 1946.

Decided June 28, 1946.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1946-06-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1953

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1946-06-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. J. Harry Welch, of Washington, D. C. with whom Mr. H. Mason Welch, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. Samuel B. Block and John R. Daily, both of Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for appellant.

¶2Mr. Robert H. McNeill, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

¶3Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and PRETTYMAN, Associate Justices.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellee has recovered damages for alleged negligent treatment administered to her by or under the direction of appellant as a physician. The evidence was conflicting. The principal question is whether the evidence favorable to appellee, if believed, supports the verdict. We find that it does. Appellant’s other assignments of error are also without merit.

¶6Affirmed.