Porter v. Lux’s Empirical Analysis
157 F.2d 756 · 1946
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1979
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hecht Co. v. Bowles · Delno v. Market St. Ry. Co. · Bowles v. Huff · Bowles v. Quon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“58 No abuse of discretion appearing the judgment is affirmed. Id. at 758. 59 What we said there is equally applicable here. 60 We do not agree with the Commission's characterization of the injunction as a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in this situation. Id. at 757. 57 (W)e are unable to say that the District Court's action constitutes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.