Porter v. Gulf Refining Co.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 8, 1946.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1946-10-08

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bowles v. Gulf Refining Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1946-10-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1993

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1David London, of Washington, D. C., and Samuel J. Weiner, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

¶2Howell, Roberts & Duncan, of Cleve- and, Ohio, and W. D. Caldwell, of Houston, Tex., for appellee.

¶3Before HICKS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause was heard on the transcript of record, briefs and arguments of counsel; on consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge found on pages 27, 28 and 29 of the transcript. 61 F.Supp. 149.