Humphrey v. Hart’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““If the master’s findings were clearly erroneous, the court should have rejected them and should have made findings of its own. If not clearly erroneous, the master’s findings should have been accepted as correct.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re San Filippo