Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 F.2d 948 - Rogers v. Squier

Rogers v. Squier’s Empirical Analysis

157 F.2d 948 · 1946

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2020

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

40194619501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James v. Dravo Contracting Co. · Bowen v. Johnston · Fort Leavenworth Co v. Lowe · Stewart v. Sadrakula · United States v. Unzeuta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In making these jurisdictional cessions it has been common practice of the states to reserve the authority to serve or execute state process, the purpose being to prevent the area affected from becoming a sanctuary for offenders or those seeking to avoid process.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The enabling act contained no provision retaining jurisdiction in the United States over this reservation. Accordingly federal jurisdiction exists only if it has been ceded by the state.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.