Porter v. Karavas’s Empirical Analysis
157 F.2d 984 · 1946
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2000
13 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. Morrison Hotel Corp. · Clyde v. Broderick · Galbreath v. Metropolitan Trust Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All doubts and ambiguities concerning the meaning and intendments of the pleader's language must be resolved in favor of the claim attempted to be stated”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Keenan v. Looney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.