Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 F.3d 1054 - Summar v. Bennett

Summar v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

157 F.3d 1054 · 1998

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
October 2017
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Wayne Thomas Ahlers and Nina Ahlers v. Ronald J. Schebil (1999), Butera v. District of Columbia (2001)

22 federal appellate · 2 district ·

490199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Butz v. Economou · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so clearly foreshadowed by applicable direct authority as to leave no doubt in the mind of a reasonable officer that his conduct was unconstitutional.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “voluntary decision to become a confidential informant with all the dangers it presented, not to mention his poor decision to fraternize with criminals in the first place, played a much greater role in his unfortunate demise”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.