United States v. Bindley’s Empirical Analysis
157 F.3d 1235 · 1998
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States of America v. Iris Collette Jackson (2000), United States v. Williams (2005)
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 5031 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Whren v. United States · Berkery v. Commissioner · United States v. Jones · United States v. Ivy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A criminal defendant is entitled to a theory of defense instruction that is legally justified and supported by sufficient evidence for a jury to find in defendant's favor. We review de novo whether a district court committed reversible error in failing to submit a requested theory of defense instruction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court has broad discretion to determine whether to award a sentence reduction pursuant to § 3E1.1 for acceptance of responsibility, and we will not disturb its decision absent clearly erroneous findings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determine whether the jury had sufficient information to make a discriminating appraisal of the witness' motives and bias.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.