Field v. Mans’s Empirical Analysis
157 F.3d 35 · 1998
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably United States v. Moran (2004), Foley & Lardner v. Biondo (1999)
28 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Quern v. Jordan · Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · Field v. Mans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'actually considered and decided by the appellate court,' or a decision on the issue must be 'necessarily inferred from the disposition on appeal.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“might [originally] have seemed an entirely redundant point”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(2) for money, property, services, or an extension, renewal, or refinancing of credit, to the extent obtained by— (A) false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor’s or an insider’s financial condition; (B) use of a statement in writing— (i) that is materially false; (ii) respecting the debtor’s or an insider’s financial condition; (iii) on which the creditor to whom the debtor is liable for such money, property, services, or credit reasonably relied; and (iv) that the debtor caused to be made or published with intent to deceive.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.