Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 F.3d 451 - United States v. Webb

United States v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

157 F.3d 451 · 1998

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
April 2013
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2013

11 federal appellate ·

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · Smith v. Barry · Brooks v. Toyotomi Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fail[ed] to designate the name of the court to which his appeal is taken, we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he notice of appeal must... name the court to which the appeal is taken,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “name the court to which the appeal is taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.