Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 F.3d 574 - Liebe v. Norton

Liebe v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis

157 F.3d 574 · 1998

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 36 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Mettler v. Whitledge (1999), Reynolds v. Giuliani (2007)

31 federal appellate · 36 district ·

6901998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant points to all of the actions which [the official] should have taken. Unfortunately, [the official] did not have the benefit of twenty-twenty hindsight, as we do now. Thus, we must examine those precautionary actions which [actually] were undertaken.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “cannot be both an effort to prevent suicides and, at the same time, deliberately indifferent to suicides.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.