16105b v. Dar Reddick’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
69 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 328 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Iris Vega v. Commissioner of Social, 16162b v. Dar E Gatliff
69 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Magallanes v. Bowen · 15229b v. Dar Lester · 15161b v. Dar a Smolen · Andrews v. Shalala · Bunnell v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 328 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The ALJ must do more than offer his conclusions. He must set forth his own interpretations and explain why they, rather than the doctors', are correct.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“a detailed and thorough summary of the facts and conflicting clinical evidence, stating his interpretation thereof, and making findings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.