Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 F.3d 843 - Technical Coating Applicators, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Technical Coating Applicators, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.’s Empirical Analysis

157 F.3d 843 · 1998

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
4
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Schilberg Integrated Metals Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. (2003), Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. Roslyn E. Kellman, Skender Bajrami, Individually and Doing Business as Kopliku Painting Company (1999)

13 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

2301998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 711 So. 2d 1135 - Deni Associates of Florida, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. · Citro Florida, Inc. v. Citrovale · Insurance Co. of North America v. Lexow · Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corporation v. Employers Insurance of Wausau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n a diversity case, a federal court applies the substantive law of the forum state, unless federal constitutional or statutory law is contrary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is plenary and we apply the same legal standards as those employed by the district court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Intervening state decisions must be given full effect as if the decisions existed during the pendency of the case in district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.