Independent Order of Foresters v. Donald, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
157 F.3d 933 · 1998
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Patricia Raniola v. Police Commissioner William Bratton (2001), Patsos v. First Albany Corp. (2001)
14 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road · Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Wagoner · De Witt Properties, Inc. v. City of New York · Leeds v. Meltz · In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is no general fiduciary duty inherent in an ordinary broker/customer relationship.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an express warranty arises as to securities being purchased when the seller directly affirms the quality or condition of the investment, the affirmation tends to induce the buyer's purchase, and the buyer purchases relying upon it”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]here is no general fiduciary duty inherent in an ordinary broker/customer relationship. [Citation.] Such a duty can arise only where the customer has delegated discretionary trading authority to the broker.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.