¶1 The case at bar has been duly considered and the decree appealed from is hereby affirmed on authority of Barton v. Moline Properties, 121 Fla. 683, 164 So. 551; Weathersbee v. Dekle, 102 Fla. 1057, 136 So. 708.
¶2 It is so ordered.
157 Fla. 259
25 So.2d 565
Decided April 5, 1946
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1946-04-05
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1962
6 state decisions
Relies on Barton v. Moline Properties, Inc. · Weathersbee v. Dekle
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1946-04-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The case at bar has been duly considered and the decree appealed from is hereby affirmed on authority of Barton v. Moline Properties, 121 Fla. 683, 164 So. 551; Weathersbee v. Dekle, 102 Fla. 1057, 136 So. 708.
¶2 It is so ordered.