Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 Fla. 62 - State Ex Rel. Watson v. Lee

State Ex Rel. Watson v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1991

18 state decisions

40194619501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Retirement Board v. McGovern · State v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad · Amos v. Mathews · Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Railroad Commissioners · State ex rel. Young v. Duval County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The delegation of legislative power challenged. in the first part of this question has reference to authorization-on the part of the Budget Commission to fix- the rates of retirement pay on the basis of actuarial factors prescribed- in the act. It would be trite to say that the legislature may enact a complete act to accomplish a public, purpose and then authorize an administrative board with designated limitations to prescribe rules and regulations for its administration. State v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 56 Fla. 617 , 47 So. 969 , 32 L.R.A.,N.S., 639; State ex rel. Young v. Duval County, 76 Fla. 180 , 79 So. 692 . The act under review does no more than this. The application of actuarial factors is a mathematical process that the Budget Commission is empowered to do, but the means for this is embraced in the four corners of the act. Experience has demonstrated that this is essential to keep the retirement scheme sound and in doing so, payments may fluctuate from time to time.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.