Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 FSUPP 46 - Dowell v. Folsom

Dowell v. Folsom’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
February 1964
most recently cited

7 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Aetna Life Insurance v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. · United States v. Lalone · Ferenz v. Folsom · Ewing v. Risher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An administrative regulation promulgated within the authority granted by statute has the force of law and must be given full effect by the courts. United States v. Short, 9 Cir., 1956, 240 F.2d 292, 298 , and cases there cited. The administrative interpretation of the act is controlling unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulations. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410 , 65 S.Ct. 1215 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 .” (loc.cit. 51)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A minor child’s entitlement to benefits under the Act is not dependent on any overt acts he may or may not have done, but on the existence or non-existence of an economic relationship which has been terminated by the death of the wage earner.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.