Pinkus v. Reilly’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2004
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1001 · 5 U.S.C. § 1002 · 5 U.S.C. § 1004
Relies on Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath · Reilly v. Pinkus · Cates v. Haderlein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No person shall in any manner be required to resort to organization . or procedure not so published.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.