Jeronimo v. Murff’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1992
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan · Delgadillo v. Carmichael · 147 F. Supp. 771 - Chanan Din Khan v. Barber · James E. Fitzgerald Ex Rel. Lorenzo Miceli v. h.r.landon, District Director, United States Immigration and Naturalization Service · 1201 Sixth Avenue Corp. v. Altor Grill & Restaurant, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The initial formulation of the same subsisting fundamental object and purpose; the utilization of precisely the same methods and procedures in each of a series of successive situations to accomplish the original objective; the continuously interacting relationship and activities of the same persons who originated and launched the project; the victimizing of the same person through all of the acts — such evi-dentiary facts may, in the aggregate, demonstrate the existence of a single”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * who at any time after entry is convicted of two crimes involving moral turpitude, not arising out of a single scheme of criminal misconduct * * (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“All of the acts and transactions alleged in each of the several counts in this indictment are connected together and constitute parts of a common scheme and plan.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.