¶1The amended grounds of the motion for new trial merely complain that the verdict is contrary to. the evidence and without evidence to support it, and contrary to certain excerpts from the charge of the court. No error is assigned on the charge of the court itself. From a careful examination of the evidence and admissions of the defendant in her amended answer, we are of the opinion that the verdict for the plaintiff is supported by evidence, and that it is not contrary to the excerpts from the charge of the court set out in the amended motion for new trial. Judgment affirmed.
157 Ga. 909
Wolfe v. McElmurray
Decided April 17, 1924
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1924-04-17
<p>Ejectment. Before Judge Franklin. Richmond superior court. July 3, 1923.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1924-04-17
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably 107 Ga. App. 178 - McCarty v. National Life & Accident Insurance (1962), Maryland Casualty Co. v. England (1925)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →