¶1Appellees successfully prosecuted this action in the lower court to foreclose a lien arising out of an assessment for the improvement of a public street in Michigan City.
¶2The identical questions are involved as were presented and decided by this court in Leeds v. Defrees, ante, 392, and on the authority of that case these questions must be decided adversely to the contentions of appellants. The judgment is, therefore, in all things affirmed.