Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 INDAPP 154 - Walton v. State

Walton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1975
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McAfee v. State · Combs v. State · Stice v. State · Petillo v. State · Melvin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence is in question, we examine it carefully, not for the purpose of finding whether or not it is adequate to overcome every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, but with the view of deciding whether an inference may be reasonably drawn therefrom tending to support the finding of the trial court. Stice v. State, 228 Ind. 144 , 89 N.E. 915 (1950); Petillo v. State, 228 Ind. 97 , 89 N.E.2d 623 (1950).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.