Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 Ind. App. 426 - Garrett v. State

157 Ind. App. 426 - Garrett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 1992 · most notably Maldonado v. State (1976), Swope v. State (1975)

41 state decisions

250197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Columbia Properties, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners · State v. Manley · United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A lawyer shall not: ... (4) Assert his personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, as to the credibility of a witness, as to the culpability of a civil litigant, or as to the guilt or innocence of an accused. . . .” [Canon 7; Disciplinary Rule 7-106 (c) (4).]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ [M] isconduct of counsel may be harmless where it has no apparent effect on the outcome of the case. If the evidence is ‘close’, reversible error will more likely be found.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The danger of prejudice to the defendant by such statements is they may imply that the prosecutor has independent personal knowledge of facts other than those introduced at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.