Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 La. 208 - Jones v. Cunningham

Jones v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2011

12 state decisions

401924193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Woods

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The default is obtained `by moving for it in court'; that is to say, by appearing in court before a judge authorized to preside over the tribunal, and empowered to hear and determine the issues between the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.