Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 La. 298 - Steeg v. Codifer

Steeg v. Codifer’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 1970
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 1970

18 state decisions

60192419301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Johnston · Matthews v. Rutherford · Mechanics' Building Ass'n v. Ferguson · Appalachian Corp. v. Ayo · Hincks v. Converse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As between the maker and payee of said note, it is clear therefore that the defense of fraudulent misrepresentation ■has been established. This being true the burden rested upon plaintiff to prove good faith and want of knowledge of such equities. Neg. Ins. Law, Sec. 59.’’ (Act 64 of 1904.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.