Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 La. 920 - Chapman v. Irwin

Chapman v. Irwin’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 1982

20 state decisions

1201925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. Louisiana Ave. Realty Co. · State v. Buck · Martel Syndicate v. Block

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The revocatory action proper presupposes that some consideration was paid for the property, whereas an action in simulation is founded on the supposition that the attacked transaction was without consideration, a mere sham, having the form or color of reality, but without substance — a fraudulent sham.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A simulated contract is one which, though clothed in concrete form, has no existence in fact, and is only a myth. It may at any time and at the demand of any party in interest be declared a sham, and it may even be ignored by creditors of the apparent vendor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.