Tabeling v. Tabeling’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Schwartz v. Merchants Mortgage Co. (1974), Winkel v. Winkel (1940)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pico v. Cohn · Cromwell v. County of Sac · Carter v. Carter · Lake v. . Lake · Maryland Steel Co. v. Marney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The charge that there was a conspiracy between the appellant’s witnesses to ‘frame’ the appellee, and that the decree was founded on their perjured testimony, likewise goes to the merits of the case, and [, being intrinsic to that trial,] is not recognized as a sound reason for setting aside a decree after it has been enrolled . . . .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.