Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 NC 528 - Ferrell v. Dixie Cotton Mills

Ferrell v. Dixie Cotton Mills’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
January 1962
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1962

9 state decisions

30191119201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the dangerous thing may not be what is termed an attractive nuisance, that is to say, not have especial attraction for children by reason of their childish instincts, yet where it is so left exposed that they are likely to come into contact with it, and where their coming in contact with it is obviously dangerous to them, the person so exposing the dangerous thing should reasonably anticipate the injury that is likely to happen to them from its being so *Page 119 exposed, and is bound to take reasonable pains to guard it, so as to prevent injury to them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.