Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 N.C. App. 303 - Street v. Smart Corp.

157 N.C. App. 303 - Street v. Smart Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably 162 N.C. App. 457 - Slaughter v. Swicegood (2004), 172 N.C. App. 386 - Coker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2005)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 48 state decisions

260200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 155 N.C. App. 110 - Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc. · 149 N.C. App. 320 - Aubin v. Susi · Energy Investors Fund, L.P. v. Metric Constructors, Inc. · 123 N.C. App. 572 - Hyde v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. · Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a lack of standing ... may be challenged by a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Standing refers to whether a party has a sufficient stake in an otherwise justiciable controversy such that he or she may properly seek adjudication of the matter. . . . The gist of standing is whether there is a justiciable controversy being litigated among adverse parties with substantial interest affected so as to bring forth a clear articulation of the issues before the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[F]or purposes of reviewing a 12(b)(6) motion made on the grounds that the plaintiff lacked standing, a real party in interest is a party who is benefitted or injured by the judgment in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.