157 Ohio App. 3d 342 - State v. Brewster’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably State v. Taylor (2007), State v. Gage (2018)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · Payton v. New York · United States v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'strictly circumscribed by the exigencies which justif[ied] its initiation.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The drawers could easily have contained `floppy disks, cassette or other tapes, CD's, and any other permanent or transient storage devices; records or documents contained on paper in handwritten, typed, photocopied, or printed form, or stored on any other type of media . . . `Detective Bickford testified at the hearing on appellant's motion to suppress that some of the external storage devices can be as small as a `remote of a key chain.' (T. at 11). Consequently, the drawer fell within the scope of the search warrant, and the police officers did not have to obtain an additional warrant to open the drawer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The time within which an accused must be brought to trial * * * may be extended only by the following: * * * (E) Any period of delay necessitated by reason of a plea in bar or abatement, motion, proceeding, or action made or instituted by the accused; * * * (H) The period of any continuance granted on the accused's own motion, and the period of any reasonable continuance granted other than upon the accused's own motion * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.