Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 Ohio App. 3d 395 - State v. Morris

157 Ohio App. 3d 395 - State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Waller v. Georgia · Jordan v. Arizona · State v. Bayless · State v. Cassano · State ex rel. Repository, Div. of Thompson Newspapers, Inc. v. Unger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “asked a female to leave the courtroom before ordering the removal of 'all those people.' " Id. at ¶ 15. On review, the First District noted that the "record [did] not indicate the identity of the persons who were subject to the court's removal order or whether the courtroom was cleared of all spectators”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “on the record before us, we cannot say that the removal of some or all of the spectators was necessary to protect an overriding interest, that there were no viable alternatives to the removal, or that the order was narrow enough to protect only an overriding interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he trial court's actions in ordering the removal of certain individuals may well have been warranted and entirely appropriate due to disruptive conduct that impeded an overriding interest in the court's orderly administration of its docket.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.