Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 Ohio App. 3d 451 - State v. Brand

157 Ohio App. 3d 451 - State v. Brand’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · Oregon v. Mathiason · California v. Beheler · State v. Burnside

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “blood [i]s drawn by medical personnel and not at the request of a law enforcement officer, the requirements of R.C. 4511.19 (D) did not apply at all.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the court may admit evidence on [sic] the concentration of alcohol * * * in the defendant's * * * blood”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.