Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 Ohio App. 3d 689 - State v. Carter

157 Ohio App. 3d 689 - State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Ford v. Wainwright · State v. Carter · State v. Jackson · Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hether, at the time of committing the offense, the offender, because of a mental disease or defect, lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law” and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “relief, but the court did so based on the fact that a defendant did not have the opportunity to litigate a claim of mental retardation prior to Atkins and to support its departure from the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he court softened the R.C. 2953.23 (A)(2) requirement that a petitioner demonstrate prejudicial constitutional error by clear and convincing evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.