157 Ohio App. 3d 689 - State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
8 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Ford v. Wainwright · State v. Carter · State v. Jackson · Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hether, at the time of committing the offense, the offender, because of a mental disease or defect, lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law” and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“relief, but the court did so based on the fact that a defendant did not have the opportunity to litigate a claim of mental retardation prior to Atkins and to support its departure from the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he court softened the R.C. 2953.23 (A)(2) requirement that a petitioner demonstrate prejudicial constitutional error by clear and convincing evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.