State v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“possessed `knowledge of and the ability to reconstruct the prior criminal occurrence and to identify the defendant from [his] observations of him at the time of the crime.' Given [the witness's] familiarity with defendant, there was little likelihood of misidentification in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“had ample opportunity to view defendant and to determine that he knew him from past encounters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“did have a source independent of the suggestive confrontation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.